LCGB Forums

The ability to post messages is restricted to LCGB members. Any questions contact us at lcgbadmin@googlemail.com

Iron Vs. Rapido

Need help with a tuning kit, how do you tune your scooter, which kit should I choose, and all general tuning and modifcations questions are for in here.

Iron Vs. Rapido

Postby DaveTomo » Sat Oct 18, 2014 11:35 am

Over the winter looking to re-build the top end, at present run a 225 Rapido with a MB billet head & 30mm delly +48 mm clubman ,its been a good set up,but fancy a change.Basically the lads I ride with run Mugello 186's & RT195's & the difference in the amount of fuel I put in compared to them is beginning to p*ss me off a bit :lol: So here's my plan,not after balls out speed, mainly run at 50-55mph on A roads when we go away, with the odd bit of motorway ,this is something I've been thinking of doing the last couple of years to be honest, just looking for a bit of feedback really.
*******************************************************************
I have a Indian iron 200 barrel on its original bore, but will need a rebore to the next size.So I'm thinking rebore, light tune/clean up of the barrel, wosner piston,recently bought (second hand ) delly 26 & exhaust will either be - RS 42mm reverse cone - 48 mm clubman or if scootopia bring out there clubman, one of those. With a GT head head (one of Rich Taylors). Spoke to AF Rayspeed with the rebore/piston & mild tune that comes in a about £172 (plus he was going to check my crank as well) I know it would be cheaper with a Asso piston.Then add on the GT porcupine head.
********************************************************************
The above isn't that far off the price of a new 200 classic rapido
********************************************************************
So far the only things I am certain of are 1) the porcupine head 2) changing to a 200 barrel.Any thoughts or feedback welcome, looking to drop the engine next month for its annual winter overhaul, and really just after a reliable mile muncher.
DaveTomo
 
Posts: 179
Joined: Fri May 30, 2014 6:24 pm

Re: Iron Vs. Rapido

Postby Scooter Paul » Sat Oct 18, 2014 1:07 pm

How about all of the above but fit one of Scootopias new 22mm carbs for really good fuel economy. This is the way I'm going.

Paul
Scooter Paul
 
Posts: 374
Joined: Fri May 30, 2014 9:41 am

Re: Iron Vs. Rapido

Postby fastcol » Sat Oct 18, 2014 7:01 pm

If its only a fuel saving exercise, i would keep your tried and tested(and run in) rapido setup and buy an LTH aftermarket reed valve.You will need to lop off a couple of the rapido's aluminium fins to allow it to fit nicely on your barrel,and after a brief upjetting session, you will cure the rapidos terrible 'spit back' all down the inside of your panels/footboards, and you will find your Fuel Consumption drastically reduced,by as much as 25%.It wont take long to repay your initial investment in the purchase of the reed valve,with only a minimal, if any, loss of performance. Not many bolt on additions actually pay for themselves,but you will find that this one does.
fastcol
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2014 9:58 pm

Re: Iron Vs. Rapido

Postby Stevepshipley » Sat Oct 18, 2014 8:50 pm

My rapido 225 (Classic tune) with 26 mm delorto and 48 mm clubman did exactly 70 miles to 5 litres and my muggy 186 with 26 mm delorto and clubman will only return 60 miles to 5 litres.....

The rapido goes well with a 26 carb in my experience
Stevepshipley
 
Posts: 247
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2014 1:33 pm

Re: Iron Vs. Rapido

Postby foremanbob » Sun Oct 19, 2014 10:22 am

fastcol wrote:If its only a fuel saving exercise, i would keep your tried and tested(and run in) rapido setup and buy an LTH aftermarket reed valve.You will need to lop off a couple of the rapido's aluminium fins to allow it to fit nicely on your barrel,and after a brief upjetting session, you will cure the rapidos terrible 'spit back' all down the inside of your panels/footboards, and you will find your Fuel Consumption drastically reduced,by as much as 25%.It wont take long to repay your initial investment in the purchase of the reed valve,with only a minimal, if any, loss of performance. Not many bolt on additions actually pay for themselves,but you will find that this one does.

Exactly.....
User avatar
foremanbob
 
Posts: 217
Joined: Sat May 31, 2014 6:02 pm
Location: Renfrewshire

Re: Iron Vs. Rapido

Postby Rich Oswald » Sun Oct 19, 2014 6:10 pm

Stevepshipley wrote:My rapido 225 (Classic tune) with 26 mm delorto and 48 mm clubman did exactly 70 miles to 5 litres and my muggy 186 with 26 mm delorto and clubman will only return 60 miles to 5 litres.....

The rapido goes well with a 26 carb in my experience


From experience of riding with mates with smaller capacity engines, ie slower scooters, I have returned better fuel consumption than them and can only think that it's because I was not getting on to the main jet quite as much as them,

Rich'
User avatar
Rich Oswald
 
Posts: 9595
Joined: Fri May 30, 2014 3:30 pm
Location: Wiseman From The East (East Of The Pennines That Is)

Re: Iron Vs. Rapido

Postby DaveTomo » Sun Oct 19, 2014 8:03 pm

Thank you chaps some food for thought,appreciate your help.Think I'll stick with the rapido & work with what I've got, 26mm delly and possibly the reed valve,thanks again
DaveTomo
 
Posts: 179
Joined: Fri May 30, 2014 6:24 pm

Re: Iron Vs. Rapido

Postby corrado » Mon Oct 20, 2014 11:55 pm

Stuck a reed valve on my Muggy 225 with PHBH26 but struggled to get it jetted right so put a Mikuni TMX 27 and now runs much better and doing around 55mpg, which apart from an SX200 with 20mm carb was far better that the others in our group over the 500 miles to 4 Nations rally. Plus ADS3 and 4.7 gearing pulls like a train now.
User avatar
corrado
 
Posts: 610
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2014 1:49 am
Location: Blackpool

Re: Iron Vs. Rapido

Postby MickYork » Tue Oct 21, 2014 7:37 am

Would a reed valve work effectively without changing the crank or altering the piston ?
MickYork
 
Posts: 1476
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2014 8:37 am

Re: Iron Vs. Rapido

Postby corrado » Tue Oct 21, 2014 9:41 am

I used a TS1 piston in my Mugello. Didn't have to do anything to the crank though.
User avatar
corrado
 
Posts: 610
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2014 1:49 am
Location: Blackpool

Re: Iron Vs. Rapido

Postby mainstand » Tue Oct 21, 2014 4:16 pm

MickYork wrote:Would a reed valve work effectively without changing the crank or altering the piston ?


You have to get a window cut into it mate thats all.

Image
User avatar
mainstand
 
Posts: 470
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2014 10:21 am

Re: Iron Vs. Rapido

Postby martyn dwane » Tue Oct 21, 2014 9:58 pm

mainstand wrote:
MickYork wrote:Would a reed valve work effectively without changing the crank or altering the piston ?


You have to get a window cut into it mate thats all.

Image


i would imagine a boost pot added in would be even better or not ?
martyn dwane
 
Posts: 449
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2014 10:06 pm
Location: SURREY

Re: Iron Vs. Rapido

Postby Adam Kelly » Thu Oct 30, 2014 5:44 pm

You don't have to cut the window but it will help ben at af rayspeed is the man to talk to am just about to do a rapido 225 with the lth reedblock he said you can run it without or just cut the bottom of the piston or you can go with the window and a boost port in the barrel it's down to you
Adam Kelly
 
Posts: 19
Joined: Sat May 31, 2014 2:49 pm


Return to Tuning & Kits

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests